Wednesday was, for me, a much-anticipated day. We have been in Jerusalem for nearly a week now, not counting the trip to Galilee, and had plenty of free time. But up through Wednesday, Julia and I didn’t spend much time in the Christian Quarter of the Old City–largely, at least for me, intentionally. Making a visit to the Church of the Resurrection has been one of the things I have been most looking forward to, but haven’t wanted to rush into. This is a place I have long thought about, studied, read about, and hoped to see.
The Anastasis (Greek for Resurrection) is the Eastern Orthodox name of the church Westerners usually know as the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. The latter was what the Crusaders called it and has passed into Latin use, and from there to the rest of us Westerners. But if you ask me, the Eastern name is a better fit. It describes the real point of the church, after all. As people at St. George’s point out, this is the only church in Christendom that claims the tomb it is built around is actually empty.
The resurrection is pretty much by definition an event impossible to pin down historically, physically, or descriptively, even if you believe in it. Take two Christians and ask them to describe what they think happened in the small hours of a silent Saturday night/Sunday morning, and you may get two completely divergent answers–and both may be equally faithful. On the other hand, the judicial execution and burial of a political criminal is well within the purview of archaeology, history, and science. And what we know about the site of the Church of the Resurrection is fascinating. It is clear that it is built on the site of a limestone quarry which had fallen out of use by the time of Jesus. On one end of the site, rock tombs of the type sealed by rolling stones and used in the first century AD (and only in a very narrow window between about 50 BC and 50 AD, apparently) were carved into the hillside. Partway down the site, a rocky outcrop stands out above the rest of the quarried-out pit, having been rejected by the stonecutters because it was composed of flawed, cracked stone. The site itself sat a couple of hundred yards outside the city wall to the west during the time of Jesus (about fifteen years later, Herod Agrippa’s expansion of Jerusalem brought it within the walls). From what we know of Roman executions, the site would have made a fine spot for a crucifixion: outside the city walls, but close enough (and prominent enough, thanks to the rocky outcrop) to provide an effective public deterrent. From what the Gospels tell us of a rocky place called Golgotha, the associations are evocative.
That’s what archaeology has told us. There is some evidence that the site was venerated liturgically by the underground Jerusalem church up through AD 66 (at least according to Jerome Murphy O’Connor, who draws his info from Eusebius and Socrates Scholasticus). At any rate, it is the site which the Christians at Jerusalem, just emerging from persecution, insisted upon when Constantine, the first Christian emperor, came looking to build a basilica on the site of the tomb of Jesus. In the mid-100’s AD, the emperor Hadrian filled in the quarry site with dirt and covered it with a temple to Aphrodite (quite possibly as a way of squelching Christian veneration of the site). This was the situation in 325 when Constantine came to power, embraced Christianity (out of political reasons perhaps as much as faith commitment), and embarked on a church-building campaign. Although other sites might well have been much more convenient to build over, given the need to demolish a temple and contend with the uneven quarry site, Constantine’s builders acted on the identification of the Jerusalem community and excavated the site. Eusebius, writing during the lifetime of Constantine, describes the excavations with pious excitement and reports that the original memorial/tomb was discovered as the dirt was dug away.
Is it the tomb of Jesus, the place where he died, was buried, and then had whatever happened to him early on Sunday morning, happen? There’s no way to positively verify anything of the kind, so we have to be content with possibilities and likelihoods. In the Oxford Archaeological Guide to the Holy Land, Jerome Murphy O’Connor writes, “Is this the place where Christ died and was buried? Very probably, Yes.” In the more measured words of Dan Bahat, former city archaeologist of Jerusalem, “We may not be absolutely certain that the site of the Holy Sepulchre Church is the site of Jesus’ burial, but we have no other site that can lay a claim nearly as weighty, and we really have no reason to reject the authenticity of the site.” (For citations for these quotes and a more detailed summary of the background, visit this site.)
At any rate, once the tomb had been unearthed, the rest is history: Constantine built a massive basilica on the site (in the process, carving the tomb out of its rocky wall and enclosing it in a freestanding structure called the edicule–something most of us moderns who prefer things au naturel might wish he hadn’t felt the need to do). A piece of wood discovered in a deep cistern at the edge of the quarry was identified as the True Cross of Christ (later its finding was attributed to Helena, Constantine’s pious mother, who was present to dedicate the church). The descriptions of the Holy Week liturgies in Jerusalem during the late 300’s which have come down to us through the pilgrim nun Egeria describe a rich array of rites taking place in the precincts of the church.
Obviously, Jerusalem has changed hands many times, and during one of those times the caliph Hakim destroyed the basilica (in the 11th century). It was rebuilt, but only in the areas of the rotunda around the edicule itself and what had been the courtyard adjoining Golgotha. The main church nave was never rebuilt, though the Crusaders added some chapels and assorted architecture, and various church communities have put up monastic buildings, etc. on the complex. Today the Church of the Resurrection is the dictionary definition of a patchwork place. It’s shared by six communities–Latin (i.e. Roman Catholic), Greek Orthodox, Armenian, Coptic, Syrian, and Ethiopian. A complex document drawn up by the Ottomans governs how they share the space–different chapels are the turf of different communions for custodial purposes, and they all get out of each other’s way for various ceremonies at different times around the edicule and other common property. The keys are held by two Muslim families to ensure access by all. Occasionally a couple of monks will have a random squabble over who moved whose curtains or who is sitting too close to whose chapel. There’s a famous ladder above the main entrance which was put out there sometime in the early 1800’s and has sat there ever since: the Armenians own the windowsill it’s leaning against, the Greeks own the ledge it stands on, and whose responsibility it is has never quite gotten resolved. It’s all very, well … byzantine.
All this means that the Resurrection can be a crazy, chaotic place; it’s not particularly visually beautiful and certainly about as far from architecturally unified as a building can be; it’s a living illustration of the sad divisions in Christ’s body the church; and it can be pretty confusing to visit, especially for the uninitiated pilgrim who just wants to visit the place where Jesus died, was buried, and was raised.
And yet with all this, it is a profoundly special place to me. In part I think this is because I’ve been steeped virtually since birth in the stories–and the liturgies–of Holy Week and Easter, and have found them full of deep, life-orienting meaning almost throughout life. Added to that, I think I’ve long had a certain fascination with being in the place where something happened. As a teenager I remember leafing through a book of photos from 20th-century Russian history and being mesmerized by a black-and-white picture of Stalin standing on top of Lenin’s tomb as triumphant soldiers of the Red Army cast the captured standards of various Nazi army regiments to the ground in front of his feet at the end of World War II. I’ve stood there–there, on that spot, right in Red Square where I go all the time–this happened THERE. Even as a ten-year-old kid in Korea when we went on vacation for the second time to Cheju Island and revisited the aquarium we’d stopped at two years before, I found myself captivated by having returned to the same site, sitting in the same row of seats where we’d been the previous time, thinking about my younger self sitting in that very spot two long years ago (a duration of time which, for a ten-year-old, counts as nostalgia-inducing).
We’ve visited a lot of holy sites on this trip. Most of them don’t carry much of that this-spot fascination for me because my rational self just can’t get into the idea that the cute baby Jesus was born right here and laid in a manger, or that John the Baptist was brought up in this anonymous Judean village instead of another. But the evidence for this site is strong enough that I can let that side of my mind take a rest and dwell instead on the heart side of things. And this is the center of the story–the crux of it all (literally)–the place where the mysterious events we commemorate as the paschal mystery likely happened, and the place where they’ve been commemorated without interruption for seventeen and perhaps twenty centuries.
It also doesn’t hurt that I’ve had some exposure to the crazy idiosyncratic nature of this particular building thanks to the church history courses of the esteemed Rev. Canon J. Robert Wright at General, whose fine article on the church’s history, layout, and features I reread and carried with me on our visit. This church building is one that repays study and familiarity. It’s a lot like the Bible. Flip it open randomly expecting to have a meaningful spiritual experience, and you might get lucky, but you’re more likely to end up vaguely confused, or downright disillusioned. Study it, learn about it, come to see it as a library or compendium rather than a single story, learn to find the high points hidden within the rest, and it gets richer and richer as you spend more time with it.
At any rate–I love this church. It feels friendly, fascinating, and holy to me, hallowed by the rites and pilgrimages of millennia as well as by the original events that I’m able to allow myself to believe happened here. And, as with everything in the spiritual life, your mileage may vary. Julia’s experience with the church is quite different from mine, not negative I think, but certainly not carrying the great weight of mystery and love I feel for the place. I think her response is more representative of most of our group than mine is, and that’s OK. In fact, that’s part of the richness of it all.
And so we visited it on Wednesday. Here’s how the day went. We had the morning free, and Julia and I spent it in the Jewish Quarter visiting two archaeological sites, the Wohl Archaeological Museum and the Burnt House. The Wohl preserves a neighborhood of mansions thought to have belonged to priestly families during the time of Herod. The Burnt House is just that–a similar priestly house which was destroyed and burned during the Roman raid on Jerusalem in AD 70 when the Temple was destroyed and the city sacked. Both had interesting artifacts to see, but the Burnt House includes an imaginative video reenactment of the life of the family that might have lived there which, though a bit low-budget in the acting department, brought to life the tensions among classes, Jews of different political persuasions, and of course the Roman occupiers of the time in a heart-wrenching way (it won’t give much away for me to tell you the family ends up killed in the Roman assault). What struck me even more was the spin the video offered on today’s situation. “In 1968, the Israeli Defense Force liberated the Jewish Quarter. Today, Jewish children are again playing in the streets of Jerusalem in safety …” etc. The upshot was very much a “never again” advocacy of military might as a way of ensuring safety and peace. I’m growing used to being ambivalent about so much of what I experience here, and I can rejoice in the emergence of an Israeli life and culture, the Hebrew language, the Jewish people of many backgrounds coming together in a homeland, and so much else about the state of Israel. And yet I’m also so conscious of Palestinians who feel very much like the Jews of AD 70 and see Israel as today’s Rome, who feel that their own children can’t play in the streets in prosperity or safety because of their own occupying power, and some of whom hope to see victory through violence of their own.
I found George Carlin’s quote about fighting for peace running through my head after the visit. (Google it if you don’t know it–R-rated warning.)
J and I walked back to the College with a stop at the Austrian Hospice, an amazing Viennese-style pilgrim house with a fabulous cafe and lovely rooftop views of the Old City, reached by an unimposing-looking gate in the most crowded part of the Muslim Quarter. After lunch, our group set out for the Resurrection, in the company of the Rev. Canon John Peterson. John is currently associated with the National Cathedral in Washington and was formerly the Secretary General of the Anglican Communion. He was also the previous Dean of St. George’s College, so he’s been around Jerusalem a time or two. With Dean Stephen Need still unavailable with a nasty virus, John was asked to lead our trip, and stepped up to the challenge in style, giving us a thorough tour.
The visit was, for me, wonderful. We began with a stop in the Ethiopian chapel; it belongs to the very poor monastic community of the Ethiopian church attached to the complex. We then entered the church proper. We ascended to the twin chapels built on top of Golgotha (one Latin, one Greek; the Latin one commemorates Jesus’ being nailed to the cross, while the Greek marks the site believed to be that of the crucifixion itself) and were able to touch the rocky surface through an opening under the altar in the Greek chapel. The bedrock is also visible from the Chapel of Adam, which is directly beneath the chapel of Golgotha.
After the stop at Golgotha, we turned right and went down to the Armenian-administered Chapel of St. Helena, located in what was the crypt of the Constantinian basilica. This chapel is already well below the level of the main church, but a second staircase leads even further down to the cistern which is now the Chapel of the Finding of the True Cross. We were surprised by a solemn evensong service in progress down there which blocked our ability to enter. As it turns out, our timing was impeccable–it was the eve of the Feast of the Finding of the True Cross, and the Latins were in the midst of a major celebration in the eponymous chapel which culminated in a procession around the entire church.
After we saw much of the rest of the building, we finally arrived at the rotunda of the edicule itself. The edicule is frankly a rather weird-looking building, dating from the 1800’s when it was last renovated, and it is in a terrible state of disrepair, held together by metal scaffolding until the four major communities agree on a plan to renovate it again. (To their credit, over the past couple of decades much of the rest of the church has been restored quite wonderfully, with new mosaics on previously dilapidated walls, and the glass windows showing the rock of Golgotha uncovered where they had been previously blocked.) Still, ugly or beautiful, weird or not, it’s the most sacred site in Christian pilgrimage, and it was a thrilling moment to lay eyes on it for the first time.
We ended up laying eyes on it for quite a while, as the Latin procession arrived while we were making our way past the edicule and we had to stop in the midst of a massive throng while they circumnambulated it three times, with full songs and prayers. It was both fascinating and beautiful for me to watch, though it made life tougher as we tried to get where we were going.
Where we were going was one of the most wonderful places in the entire church: the chapel of St. Nicodemus, located at the end of the Rotunda, on the far side of the edicule. This chapel is owned by the Armenians, but not having enough clergy to staff it, they haven’t restored it in what looks like forever. They do allow the even poorer Syrian Orthodox church to use it, though. So each week the Syrian Orthodox Christians bring in linens, vestments, candles, and everything else and celebrate their liturgy in the midst of what looks like a bombed-out space with a poor falling-apart wooden altar. I don’t believe I’ve ever seen a functioning liturgical space that looks this dilapidated, and it’s a poignant place in the midst of Christianity’s most glorious monument. But that’s not all. In the side wall of this chapel is an opening big enough for two or three people to go in. The opening proves to be the antechamber for a series of kokh tombs–the tombs of the first century, the rolling-stone tomb of the time of Jesus. There are at least five of them opening off the antechamber; three are bricked up, and two are open and empty. Tradition has identified these as the tombs of Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea, the righteous men who help bury Jesus in John’s gospel. What they indisputably prove is that this site was in use as a burial site in the time of Jesus. It is not difficult at all to imagine a catacomb of similar tombs stretching from here the few yards over to the site of the edicule. To step from the beautiful, ill-treated liturgical space of the Syrian Orthodox into this antechamber is an experience of awe.
After visiting the chapel and the tombs, we continued to the other side of the edicule, where Cn. Peterson regaled us with stories of the annual Easter ceremony of the Holy Fire. You can read about this with any quick Google search, so I won’t describe it in this already-novel-length post, but it must be a pretty remarkable thing to experience, to say the least.
I freely admit I haven’t had enough time in the Anastasis yet to suit me. I’m getting up early tomorrow and going in, hoping to be able to enter the edicule before the line is too tremendous, and to make my own visit to the tomb, something we didn’t do on Wednesday. We will see.